Bethany Marie Mooradian et al v. Ms. Sheila Edwards et al



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-B09-10408M
Court Case Number: 2:09-cv-10408-BAF-VMM
File Date: Monday, February 02, 2009
Plaintiff: Bethany Marie Mooradian
Ms. Bethany Marie Mooradian
Plaintiff Counsel: Christopher J. Nesi of Nesi and Associates, P.C.
Bethany Marie Mooradian PRO SE
Defendant: Ms. Sheila Edwards
Ms. Anamarie Sabbagh
Cause: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement
Court: Michigan Eastern District Court
Judge: District Judge Bernard A Friedman
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Virginia M Morgan
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
2/2/2009 1 COMPLAINT filed by Bethany Marie Mooradian against Sheila Edwards, Anamarie Sabbagh with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: 06450000000001856442 - Fee: $ 350. County of 1st Plaintiff: King County, WA - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland County, MI. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Nesi, Christopher) (Entered: 02/02/2009)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate