Brian Andr'e Warren v. Xlibris Corporation



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-B10-885X
Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-00885-WTL -TAB
File Date: Tuesday, July 06, 2010
Plaintiff: Brian Andr'e Warren
Plaintiff Counsel: Brian Andr'e Warren - Pro Se
Defendant: Xlibris Corporation
Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Judge: Judge William T. Lawrence
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
7/12/2010 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DH) (Entered: 07/13/2010)
7/6/2010 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, BRIAN ANDR'E WARREN. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of prisoner account activity)(DH) (Entered: 07/13/2010)
7/6/2010 1 COMPLAINT filed by BRIAN ANDR'E WARREN against XLIBRIS CORPORATION. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A-books in print)(DH) (Entered: 07/13/2010)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate