AF Holdings LLC v. John Doe
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-A12-4222J
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-04222
File Date: Thursday, May 31, 2012
Plaintiff: AF Holdings LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Paul A. Duffy - Attorney at Law
Defendant: John Doe
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Judge: Honorable John W. Darrah
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
5/31/2012 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff AF HOLDINGS LLC, by Paul A. Duffy (Duffy, Paul) (Entered: 05/31/2012)
5/31/2012 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Duffy, Paul) (Entered: 05/31/2012)
5/31/2012 2 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by AF HOLDINGS LLC, (Duffy, Paul) (Entered: 05/31/2012)
5/31/2012 1 COMPLAINT filed by AF HOLDINGS LLC,; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-7202768. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Copyright, # 2 Exhibit Assignment Agreement)(Duffy, Paul) (Entered: 05/31/2012)
5/31/2012 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John W. Darrah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. (mh, ) (Entered: 05/31/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate