Laudir Lugo v. Nahum Rosario et al



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-L10-4756N
Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-04756
File Date: Thursday, July 29, 2010
Plaintiff: Laudir Lugo
Plaintiff Counsel: Charles L. Mudd Jr. of Mudd Law Offices
Defendant: Nahum Rosario
Maranatha World Revival Ministries
Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Judge: Honorable Ronald A. Guzman
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
7/29/2010 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Laudir Lugo by Charles Lee Mudd, Jr (Mudd, Charles) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
7/29/2010 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mudd, Charles) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
7/29/2010 1 COMPLAINT filed by Laudir Lugo; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-5065807.(Mudd, Charles) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
7/29/2010 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. (jn, ) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate