World Digital Rights, Inc. v. John Does 1-100
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-W12-21465J
Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-21465-PAS
File Date: Thursday, April 19, 2012
Plaintiff: World Digital Rights, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Omar Ortega of Dorta & Ortega PA
Defendant: John Does 1-100
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Patricia A. Seitz
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
4/19/2012 3 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (bb) (Entered: 04/19/2012)
4/19/2012 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Patricia A. Seitz and Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton (jc) (Entered: 04/19/2012)
4/19/2012 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe 1-100. Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 113C-4657809, filed by World Digital Rights, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ortega, Omar) (Entered: 04/19/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate