Andrew Moore v. Dayglow, LLC et al

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-A11-24643D
Court Case Number: 1:11-cv-24643-JEM
File Date: Thursday, December 29, 2011
Plaintiff: Andrew Moore
Plaintiff Counsel: Adam Cohen of Law Offices of Adam Cohen
Defendant: Dayglow, LLC
Sebastian Solano
Sean Rodney Fountain
Does 1-5
Cause: 17:0101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Jose E. Martinez

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
12/29/2011 5 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 12/29/2011 in the amount of $ 350.00, receipt number FLS100030916 (jua) (Entered: 12/29/2011)
12/29/2011 4 NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of 1 Complaint by Andrew Moore (cbr) (Entered: 12/29/2011)
12/29/2011 3 FORM AO 121 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE (cbr) (Main Document 3 replaced on 12/29/2011) (cbr). (Entered: 12/29/2011)
12/29/2011 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez (cbr) (Entered: 12/29/2011)
12/29/2011 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fee $ 350.00, filed by Andrew Moore. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cbr) (Entered: 12/29/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate