Webimax, LLC v. Daniel Johnson



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-W11-993D
Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-00993-MMH-JBT
File Date: Tuesday, October 04, 2011
Plaintiff: Webimax, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Courtney K. Grimm of Bedell Dittmar DeVault Pillans & Coxe PA
Defendant: Daniel Johnson
Cause: 28:1338 Copyright Infringement
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Judge: Judge Marcia Morales Howard
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Joel B. Toomey
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
10/5/2011 2 AMENDED STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Jacksonville Divisional Judges on 5/25/2005.(EAM) (Entered: 10/05/2011)
10/4/2011 1 COMPLAINT against Daniel Johnson with Jury Demand and CD(Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number JAX003297) filed by Webimax, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A-E)(EAM) (Entered: 10/05/2011)
10/4/2011 Summons issued as to Daniel Johnson. (EAM) (Entered: 10/05/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2014 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate