Patrick Collins, Inc. v. John Does 1-31
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-P12-402J
Court Case Number: 2:12-cv-00402-UA-SPC
File Date: Thursday, July 26, 2012
Plaintiff: Patrick Collins, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: M. Keith Lipscomb of Lipscomb, Eisenberg & Baker, PL
Defendant: John Does 1-31
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Florida Middle District Court
Judge: Judge Unassigned Judge
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
7/26/2012 2 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/7/09. (drn) (Entered: 07/26/2012)
7/26/2012 1 COMPLAINT for copyright infringement against John Does 1-31 with Jury Demand (Filing fee $350 receipt number FtM003182) filed by Patrick Collins, Inc.(Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A, #(2) Exhibit B, #(3) Exhibit C, #(4) Civil Cover Sheet).(drn) (Entered: 07/26/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria


IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate