Catherine Creel v. iUniverse, Inc. et al



 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
 
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
 
Docket TextDocket
Text
 
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
 
Docket TextRelated
Cases
 

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-C09-1753I
Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-01753-CMA
File Date: Friday, July 24, 2009
Plaintiff: Catherine Creel
Plaintiff Counsel: David A. Weinstein of Law Offices of David A. Weinstein
Defendant: iUniverse, Inc.
Amazon.com, Inc.
Barnes & Noble, Inc.
Buynow, Inc.
Lulu Holdings, LLC
On-Demand Publishing LLC
Tino Georgiou
K. G. Glaub
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Colorado District Court
Judge: Judge Christine M. Arguello
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
7/24/2009 2 REPORT on the filing of an action mailed to Register of Copyrights (jak, ) (Entered: 07/27/2009)
7/24/2009 1 COMPLAINT against Tino Georgiou, K. G. Glaub, iUniverse, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Barnes & Noble, Inc., Buynow, Inc., Lulu Holdings, LLC, On-Demand Publishing LLC ( Filing fee $ 350, Receipt Number 20699) Summons Issued, filed by Catherine Creel. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Receipt)(jak, ) (Entered: 07/27/2009)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2012 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate