Patrick Collins, Inc. v. John Does 1-9
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-P12-1437J
Court Case Number: 3:12-cv-01437-BTM-MDD
File Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Plaintiff: Patrick Collins, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Leemore Kushner of Kushner Law Group
Defendant: John Does 1-9
Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement
Court: California Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
6/13/2012 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Patrick Collins, Inc. (kcm) (Entered: 06/13/2012)
6/13/2012 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against John Does 1 through 9 ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0974-4836382) filed by Patrick Collins, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Case Cover Sheet, # 2 Copyright Report, # 3 Exhibit A - IP Numbers List, # 4 Exhibit B - Internet Screen Shot)The new case number is 3:12-cv-1437-BTM-MDD. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Kushner, Leemore)(kcm) (Entered: 06/13/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate