Perfect 10, Inc. v. Netsaits B.v. et al
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-P10-1773N
Court Case Number: 3:10-cv-01773-BEN -NLS
File Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Plaintiff: Perfect 10, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Eric Benink of Krause Kalfayan Benink & Slavens
Defendant: Netsaits B.v.
Netsaits Holding B.V.
Jennsights, Inc.
Gerco Marash
Does 1-10
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: California Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Roger T. Benitez
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
8/25/2010 2 Summons Issued as to Jennsights, Inc., Gerco Marash, Netsaits B.v., and Netsaits Holding B.V. (jer) (Entered: 08/25/2010)
8/25/2010 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Jennsights, Inc., Gerco Marash, Netsaits B.v., Netsaits Holding B.V., and DOES ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 17316.), filed by Perfect 10, Inc.(jer) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/25/2010: # 1 Copyright Letter) Letter Mailed (jer). (Entered: 08/25/2010)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate