AF Holdings LLC v. John Doe
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-A12-1840D
Court Case Number: 3:12-cv-01840-AJB-WVG
File Date: Thursday, July 26, 2012
Plaintiff: AF Holdings LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Brett Langdon Gibbs of Prenda Law Inc.
Defendant: John Doe
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Court: California Southern District Court
Judge: Judge Anthony J. Battaglia
Referred To: Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
7/26/2012 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (vam) (Entered: 07/26/2012)
7/26/2012 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against John Doe ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0974-4983219.), filed by AF Holdings LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet, # 4 Copyright Report)The new case number is 3:12-cv-1840-AJB-WVG. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Gibbs, Brett)(vam) (Entered: 07/26/2012)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate