Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-A08-3251P
Court Case Number: 3:08-cv-03251-JL
File Date: Thursday, July 03, 2008
Plaintiff: Apple Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: James G. Gilliland, Jeb Oblak, Megan M. Chung, Mehrnaz B. Smith of Townsend & Townsend & Crew LLP
Defendant: Psystar Corporation
Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement
Court: California Northern District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge James Larson

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
7/3/2008 2 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 10/15/2008. Case Management Conference set for 10/22/2008 10:30 AM. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order)(slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2008) (Entered: 07/08/2008)
7/3/2008 1 COMPLAINT; summons issued against Psystar Corporation (Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 34611020943). Filed by Apple Inc. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2008) (Entered: 07/08/2008)
7/3/2008 CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2008) (Entered: 07/08/2008)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2015 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate