Bridgeport Music Inc v. Cash Money Records Inc et al

Court DocumentsCourt
Docket TextDocket
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Docket TextRelated

Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-B11-4952C
Court Case Number: 2:11-cv-04952-DDP -MRW
File Date: Friday, June 10, 2011
Plaintiff: Bridgeport Music Inc
Plaintiff Counsel: Mark L Block of Law Offices of Mark L Block
Paul H Duvall of King and Ballow
Defendant: Cash Money Records Inc
UMG Recordings Inc
Bryan Williams
Michael Carter, Jr
Universal Music Distribution Corp
Young Money Publishing Inc
Warner Tamerlane Publishing Corp
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: California Central District Court
Judge: Judge Dean D. Pregerson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker

Date # Docket Text
6/10/2011 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Michael Carter, Jr, Cash Money Records Inc, UMG Recordings Inc, Universal Music Distribution Corp, Warner Tamerlane Publishing Corp, Bryan Williams, Young Money Publishing Inc. Case assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R Wilner.(Filing fee $ 350 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Bridgeport Music Inc. (et) (Entered: 06/10/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?

Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria

Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2015 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.

extended validation certificate