James Andrew Polt v. Department of Law Office of the Attorney General
 
SummaryLawsuit
Summary
  
Court DocumentsCourt
Documents
  
Docket TextDocket
Text
  
Lawsuit Tracker™Lawsuit
Tracker™
  
Docket TextRelated
Cases
  

Lawsuit Details
RFC Case Number: C-J11-221D
Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-00221-JWS
File Date: Thursday, November 10, 2011
Plaintiff: James Andrew Polt
Plaintiff Counsel: James Andrew Polt - Pro Se
Defendant: Department of Law Office of the Attorney General
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Alaska District Court
Judge: Judge John W. Sedwick
Notes:

Docket Text
This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
11/10/2011 4 Unissued summons re Defendant Department of Law Office of the Attorney General. (TYM, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/10/2011)
11/10/2011 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Andrew Polt.(TYM, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/10/2011)
11/10/2011 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (TYM, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/10/2011)
11/10/2011 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Law Office of the Attorney General, filed by James Andrew Polt.(TYM, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/10/2011)
Need more info about this lawsuit?
Court Documents Instantly access recently filed official court documents
Docket Text Review activity within the case
Lawsuit Tracker™ Get automatic notifications of any new information about this case.
Related Cases Review similar cases found across multiple criteria




Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2008-2013 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.
extended validation certificate