847-705-7100   |    Sign In   |    Shopping Cart Cart (0)

Visiplex, Inc. v. Primex, Inc.




Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-V10-1475P
Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-01475
File Date: Friday, March 05, 2010
Plaintiff: Visiplex, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Michael L. Lauzon of Law Offices of Michael Lauzon
Defendant: Primex, Inc.
Cause: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Judge: Honorable Virginia M. Kendall
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
3/5/2010 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Visiplex, Inc. by Michael L. Lauzon (Lauzon, Michael) (Entered: 03/05/2010)
3/5/2010 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Lauzon, Michael) (Entered: 03/05/2010)
3/5/2010 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT filed by Visiplex, Inc.; Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-4588692. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit "A", # 2 Exhibit Exhibit "B", # 3 Exhibit Exhibit "C", # 4 Exhibit Exhibit "D")(Lauzon, Michael) (Entered: 03/05/2010)
3/5/2010 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Nan R. Nolan. (nsf, ) (Entered: 03/05/2010)

Download Case Documents



Get a copy of the official court documents from only $0.99




MONITOR THIS CASE WITH OUR EXCLUSIVE

LAWSUIT TRACKER

Automatic monitoring.
Email notification of any docket updates.
From $3.99/month.
Click Here






Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2010 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.