847-705-7100   |    Sign In   |    Shopping Cart Cart (0)

Atticus Research Corporation v. Uptime Software Inc.




Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-A10-349U
Court Case Number: 4:10-cv-00349
File Date: Thursday, February 04, 2010
Plaintiff: Atticus Research Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: C. Dale Quisenberry, John T. Polasek, Jeffrey S. David of Polasek Quisenberry & Arrington LLP
Defendant: Uptime Software Inc.
Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Judge: Vanessa D. Gilmore
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
2/4/2010 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/4/2010 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Vanessa D Gilmore.(Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) (Attachments: # 1 Judge's Procedure) Parties notified.(ckrus, ) (Entered: 02/04/2010)
2/4/2010 1 COMPLAINT against Uptime Software Inc (Filing fee $ 350) filed by Atticus Research Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ckrus, ) (Entered: 02/04/2010)
2/4/2010 Summons Issued as to Uptime Software Inc, filed.(ckrus, ) (Entered: 02/04/2010)

Download Case Documents



Get a copy of the official court documents from only $0.99




MONITOR THIS CASE WITH OUR EXCLUSIVE

LAWSUIT TRACKER

Automatic monitoring.
Email notification of any docket updates.
From $3.99/month.
Click Here






Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2010 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.