847-705-7100   |    Sign In   |    Shopping Cart Cart (0)

Ebony Latrice Batts et al v. William James Adams, Jr. et al




Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-E10-539W
Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-00539
File Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Plaintiff: Ebony Latrice Batts
Manfred Mohr
Plaintiff Counsel: Ira P. Gould, Ryan L. Greely of Law Offices of Ira Gould
Defendant: William James Adams, Jr.
Stacey Ann Ferguson
Allan Pineda Lindo
Jaime Gomez
Universal Music Group, Inc.
Interscope Records
EMI April Music, Inc.
Headphone Junkie Publishing, LLC
Will.I.Am Music, Inc.
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Judge: Unassigned
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
1/26/2010 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ebony Latrice Batts, Manfred Mohr by Ira P. Gould (Gould, Ira) (Entered: 01/26/2010)
1/26/2010 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Ebony Latrice Batts, Manfred Mohr by Ryan Leigh Greely (Greely, Ryan) (Entered: 01/26/2010)
1/26/2010 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Greely, Ryan) (Entered: 01/26/2010)
1/26/2010 1 COMPLAINT filed by Manfred Mohr, Ebony Latrice Batts; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-4471302. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Greely, Ryan) (Entered: 01/26/2010)

Download Case Documents



Get a copy of the official court documents from only $0.99




MONITOR THIS CASE WITH OUR EXCLUSIVE

LAWSUIT TRACKER

Automatic monitoring.
Email notification of any docket updates.
From $3.99/month.
Click Here






Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2010 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.