847-705-7100   |    Sign In   |    Shopping Cart Cart (0)

TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Cellnet 7, Inc. et al




Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: T-T09-23670C
Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-23670-JLK
File Date: Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Plaintiff: TracFone Wireless, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: James B. Baldinger, Aaron S. Weiss, Steven J. Brodie of Calrton Fields PA
Defendant: Cellnet 7, Inc.
Natalia Sierra
Ihossvany Diaz
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question
Court: Florida Southern District Court
Judge: Senior Judge James Lawrence King
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
12/9/2009 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TracFone Wireless, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate America Movil, S.A. de C.V. for TracFone Wireless, Inc.. (dj) (Entered: 12/09/2009)
12/9/2009 2 Filing fee: For new case $ 350.00, receipt number 1013322 (dj) (Entered: 12/09/2009)
12/9/2009 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Injunctive Relief against Cellnet 7, Inc., Ihossvany Diaz, Natalia Sierra. Filing fee $ 350.00, filed by TracFone Wireless, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix)(dj) (Entered: 12/09/2009)

Download Case Documents



Get a copy of the official court documents from only $0.99



IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info



MONITOR THIS CASE WITH OUR EXCLUSIVE

LAWSUIT TRACKER

Automatic monitoring.
Email notification of any docket updates.
From $3.99/month.
Click Here






Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2010 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.