847-705-7100   |    Sign In   |    Shopping Cart Cart (0)

Corbis Corporation v. Kirusa, Inc.




Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: C-C09-8853K
Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-08853-RJH
File Date: Monday, October 19, 2009
Plaintiff: Corbis Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Gianfranco G. Mitrione, Jeffrey L. Loop, Marc S. Reiner of Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Defendant: Kirusa, Inc.
Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Court: New York Southern District Court
Judge: Richard J. Holwell
Notes:

Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
10/20/2009 Mailed notice to Register of Copyrights to report the filing of this action. (mro) (Entered: 10/20/2009)
10/19/2009 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Corbis Corporation.(mro) (Entered: 10/20/2009)
10/19/2009 1 COMPLAINT against Kirusa, Inc. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 703693)Document filed by Corbis Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(mro) (Entered: 10/20/2009)
10/19/2009 Case Designated ECF. (mro) (Entered: 10/20/2009)
10/19/2009 Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. (mro) (Entered: 10/20/2009)
10/19/2009 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kirusa, Inc. (mro) (Entered: 10/20/2009)

Download Case Documents



Get a copy of the official court documents from only $0.99



IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info



MONITOR THIS CASE WITH OUR EXCLUSIVE

LAWSUIT TRACKER

Automatic monitoring.
Email notification of any docket updates.
From $3.99/month.
Click Here






Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2010 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.