847-705-7100   |    Sign In   |    Shopping Cart Cart (0)

D2L Ltd. et al v. Blackboard, Inc.




Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-D09-1763B
Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-01763-WDQ
File Date: Monday, July 06, 2009
Plaintiff: D2L Ltd.
Desire2Learn Incorporated
Plaintiff Counsel: Hugh J. Marbury, John C. Dougherty, Sonia S. Cho, John M. Guaragna, Brian K. Erickson, John Allcock of DLA Piper US LLP
Defendant: Blackboard, Inc.
Cause: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement
Court: Maryland District Court
Judge: William D. Quarles, Jr.
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
7/7/2009 4 Correspondence mailed to the Director of the US Patent & Trademark Office. (raf, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/07/2009)
7/7/2009 3 Summons Issued 20 days as to Blackboard, Inc. (raf, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/07/2009)
7/7/2009 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by D2L Ltd., Desire2Learn Incorporated. (Cho, Sonia) (Entered: 07/07/2009)
7/6/2009 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Blackboard, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 04160000000002170012.), filed by D2L Ltd., Desire2Learn Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons)(Cho, Sonia) (Entered: 07/07/2009)

Download Case Documents



Get a copy of the official court documents from only $0.99




MONITOR THIS CASE WITH OUR EXCLUSIVE

LAWSUIT TRACKER

Automatic monitoring.
Email notification of any docket updates.
From $3.99/month.
Click Here






Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2010 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.