847-705-7100   |    Sign In   |    Shopping Cart Cart (0)

Ping Yip (Winnie) v. Hallmark Gift Land et al




Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-P09-1293H
Court Case Number: 2:09-cv-01293-FSH-PS
File Date: Friday, March 20, 2009
Plaintiff: Ping Yip (Winnie)
Plaintiff Counsel: Ping Yip (Winnie) - Pro Se
Defendant: Hallmark Gift Land
Super Smarty Pants
Amazon.com
LA Toys Etcetra
Etreasures Gifts
Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Court: New Jersey District Court
Judge: Judge Faith S. Hochberg
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Patty Shwartz
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
3/23/2009 3 Summons Issued as to HALLMARK GIFT LAND, SUPER SMARTY PANTS, AMAZON.COM, LA TOYS ETCETRA, ETREASURES GIFTS. Days Due - 20. (SUMMONS MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF) (ld, ) (Entered: 03/23/2009)
3/20/2009 2 AO120 Patent/Trademark Form filed. (ld, ) (Entered: 03/23/2009)
3/20/2009 1 COMPLAINT against HALLMARK GIFT LAND, SUPER SMARTY PANTS, AMAZON.COM, LA TOYS ETCETRA, ETREASURES GIFTS ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 356026.) Jury Demand., filed by PING YIP (Winnie). (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ld, ) (Entered: 03/23/2009)

Download Case Documents



Get a copy of the official court documents from only $0.99




MONITOR THIS CASE WITH OUR EXCLUSIVE

LAWSUIT TRACKER

Automatic monitoring.
Email notification of any docket updates.
From $3.99/month.
Click Here






Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2010 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.