847-705-7100   |    Sign In   |    Shopping Cart Cart (0)

TomTom Global Assets B.V. v. Microsoft Corporation




Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-T09-118M
Court Case Number: 2:09-cv-00118-RAJ-JEB
File Date: Monday, March 16, 2009
Plaintiff: TomTom Global Assets B.V.
Plaintiff Counsel: Barry E. Bretschneider, John P. Corrado, John A. Trocki III of Morrison & Foerster LLP
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Cause: 28:1338 Patent Infringement
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Judge: District Judge Raymond A. Jackson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge James E. Bradberry
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
3/16/2009 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by TomTom Global Assets B.V. (kgri) (Entered: 03/19/2009)
3/16/2009 1 COMPLAINT against Microsoft Corporation (Filing fee $350.00; receipt number 14683004608), filed by TomTom Global Assets B.V. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Receipt, # 6 Civil Cover Sheet)(kgri) (Entered: 03/19/2009)

Download Case Documents



Get a copy of the official court documents from only $0.99



IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info



MONITOR THIS CASE WITH OUR EXCLUSIVE

LAWSUIT TRACKER

Automatic monitoring.
Email notification of any docket updates.
From $3.99/month.
Click Here






Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2010 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.