847-705-7100   |    Sign In   |    Shopping Cart Cart (0)

Stragent, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation et al




Lawsuit Details

RFC Case Number: P-S08-341M
Court Case Number: 2:08-cv-00341
File Date: Tuesday, September 09, 2008
Plaintiff: Stragent, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Eric M. Albritton of Albritton Law Firm
Thomas J. Ward Jr. of Ward & Smith
Danny L. Williams, Chris Cravey, Matthew R. Rodgers of Williams Morgan & Amerson PC
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Ford Motor Company
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Judge: David Folsom
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham
Notes:
Patent Details:
Patent Information Available To Active Paid Subscribers Only
Already have an account? Login Now
Need an account? Register for a Free Trial



Docket Text

This may not be the most complete up-to-date docket information.
For daily updates on this case, sign-up for a Lawsuit Tracker.
See the box on the right side of this page for details on the Lawsuit Tracker


Date # Docket Text
9/9/2008 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas John Ward, Jr on behalf of Stragent, LLC (Ward, Thomas) (Entered: 09/09/2008)
9/9/2008 1 COMPLAINT against Microsoft Corporation, Ford Motor Company ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 05400000000001686870.), filed by Stragent, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Albritton, Eric) (Entered: 09/09/2008)

Download Case Documents



Get a copy of the official court documents from only $0.99



IP Lawfirms & Attorneys

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Info



MONITOR THIS CASE WITH OUR EXCLUSIVE

LAWSUIT TRACKER

Automatic monitoring.
Email notification of any docket updates.
From $3.99/month.
Click Here






Home   |   About   |   Lawsuits   |   Register   |   Login   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Sitemap   |   RSS Feed   |   Contact

© Copyright 2010 RFC Express — All Rights Reserved — Presented By Intellectual Property Today

RFC Express provides access to public lawsuit filings retrieved from the U.S. Federal District Courts.
These lawsuits, and associated information should not be considered findings of fact or liability. Nor do they reflect the views of RFC Express or any of its employees.